Comment
Jonathan Rowland
–
Editor
Palladian Publications Ltd
15 South Street, Farnham,
Surrey, GU9 7QU, UK
t: +44 (0)1252 718999
f: +44 (0)1252 718992
w:
Managing Editor
James Little
Editorial Assistant
Harleigh Hobbs
Advertisement Director
Rod Hardy
Advertisement Manager
Ryan Freeman
Production
Ben Munro
Circulation Manager
Victoria McConnell
Subscriptions
Laura Cowell
Office Administrator
Jo Repton
Website Manager
Tom Fullerton
Website Editor
CallumO'Reilly
Correspondents
Barry Baxter
Gordon Cope
Publisher
Nigel Hardy
World Coal (ISSN No: 0968-3224, USPS No: 020-997) is published
monthly by Palladian Publications Ltd, GBR, and distributed in the USA
by Asendia USA, 17B S Middlesex Ave, Monroe NJ 08831. Periodicals
postage paid New Brunswick, NJ, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: send address changes to World Coal, 701C Ashland Ave,
Folcroft PA 19032.
Annual subscription (monthly) £110 UK including postage, £125/
E
175
overseas (airmail), US$200 US/Canada (airmail). Two-year discounted
rate (monthly) £176 UK including postage, £200/
E
280 overseas (airmail),
US$320 US/Canada (airmail). Claims for non-receipt of issues must be
made within four months of publication of the issue or they will not be
honoured without charge.
Michael King
Ng Weng Hoong
Comment
“T
he US coal industry as currently structured is unsustainable.” Such was
the damning judgement, not of any environmental group or politician,
but of Kevin Crutchfield – the Chairman and CEO of one of the largest (and
now bankrupt) coal producers in the US, Alpha Natural Resources (ANR). It is a
remarkable fall from grace for an industry that until recently generated over half
of US electricity. Where did it go wrong?
Crutchfield suggests five causes behind the financial crunch that has seen
Patriot Coal (twice), Walter Energy, Edison Mission Energy and James River Coal
enter bankruptcy along with ANR, and Peabody Energy announce a billion dollar
loss in 2Q15. It’s a familiar list.
n
Falling demand and pricing on the back of increasing regulation.
n
Cheap and abundant gas.
n
A plethora of legacy retirement, pension and restoration costs.
n
Substantial environmental and restoration obligations.
n
Reclamation bonding demands that constrain available liquidity.
Missing from that list, which was included in Crutchfield’s declaration to the
bankruptcy court as part of ANR’s bankruptcy filing, was the debt burden taken
on by many US coal operators to fund acquisitions during the halcyon days of 2011
when prices for metallurgical coal hovered between US$250 and US$300 per tonne
and thermal coal was similarly buoyant at well over US$100 per tonne.
These were heady days for the mining industry as a whole – days for which the
industry has paid heavily over the past few years. And it was no exception for the
US coal industry: between them, the top three producers spent US$17.1 billion on
acquisitions in 2011.
This added debt has left companies far more vulnerable to the subsequent black
swan events that have crippled the industry: the shale gas boom; a hugely
increased regulatory burden; and the economic realignment in China that has seen
its demand for all commodities fall away just as major producers have ramped up
production. And it means that more pain may well be on the way.
“There are a number of highly‑leveraged companies […] that remain vulnerable
to restructuring,” Anna Zubets‑Anderson, VP Senior Analyst at Moody’s told me
recently, before presciently naming ANR as one example, as well as Arch Coal.
So where are the bright spots? As we point out in our Coal News on p. 5,
different coal basins will be impacted differently, with the Illinois Basin best
positioned, according to Zubets‑Anderson, while smaller, nimbler producers are
likely to fare better than the heavy hitters. But the most positive outlook comes
from taking the global view – as
World Coal
does. Take, for example, Vietnam. The
US Energy Information Administration reckons that the use of coal will grow
substantially there to 2030 as the country moves from a primarily agrarian to an
industrial economy.
Indeed, barring some Parisian miracle at the UN climate talks later this year,
coal will remain the bedrock of global power demand – and an essential ingredient
in the steelmaking process – for the foreseeable future. And if the past five years
has taught us anything, it is that the energy landscape can change unpredictably,
dramatically and remarkably quickly. In a world of high geopolitical and economic
uncertainty, who is to say that the next five years won’t see coal – with its security
of supply, low costs and abundance – back in favour.
